Home
About BIOTIC
Browse
Get Traits
Traits Resources
Glossary
References
Citations
Publications
Home
Leptopsammia pruvoti
Researched By
Angus Jackson
Data Supplied By
MarLIN
Refereed by
Paul Tranter
Taxonomy
Scientific name
Leptopsammia pruvoti
Common name
Sunset cup coral
MCS Code
D804
Recent Synonyms
Leptopsammia microcardia
Phylum
Cnidaria
Subphylum
Superclass
Anthozoa
Class
Hexacorallia
Subclass
Order
Scleractinia
Suborder
Family
Caryophylliidae
Genus
Leptopsammia
Species
pruvoti
Subspecies
Additional Information
The synonym
Leptopsammia microcardia
was last used by Abel (1959) and Rutzler, 1966 despite the general recognition of their synonymy since 1954.
Taxonomy References
Hayward
et al
., 1996
,
Howson & Picton, 1997
,
Manuel, 1988
,
Anonymous, 1999(f)
,
Zibrowius, 1980
General Biology
Growth form
Cylindrical, Radial
Feeding method
Predator, Passive suspension feeder
Mobility/Movement
Permanent attachment
Environmental position
Epifaunal, Epilithic
Typical food types
Zooplankton, organic particulates
Habit
Attached
Bioturbator
Not relevant
Flexibility
None (< 10 degrees)
Fragility
Fragile
Size
Small-medium(3-10cm)
Height
6 cm
Growth Rate
1.3 mm/year
Adult dispersal potential
None
Dependency
Independent
Sociability
Solitary
Toxic/Poisonous?
No
Additional Information
Younger individuals have a round calice which becomes elliptical with age. The skeleton is porous. It is not known whether the species is hermaphroditic or gonochoristic. The size range applies to maximum height of the corallum. The longest diameter of the calyx is 17 mm. Growth rate has been observed to be very slow in aquarium specimens which are little fed and in same seawater for several months (2 mm across calice after 18 months) but can be fast if fed and in continuous seawater supply (to 10 mm across calice after one year. (Paul Tranter, pers. comm.). Typically found as solitary individuals but may occur as several corallia from the same base forming 'pseudocolonies': during culture experiments, if any of the tissue overlying the skeletal column was lost, there would eventually appear, over a matter of weeks, one or more small polyps which would eventually form part of the 'parent' skeleton and give the impression of a naturally formed colony (Paul Tranter, pers. comm.).
Leptopsammia pruvoti
is known to have the ability to control and possibly 'farm' the bacterial content of its coelenteric cavity (Herndl & Velimirov, 1985). These bacteria could be used as an additional food source. The horseshoe worm
Phoronis hippocrepia
and the fan worm
Potamilla reniformis
bore into the base of the skeleton of
Leptopsammia pruvoti
and the bivalve
Hiatella arctica
further enlarges these boreholes. Once bored, the skeleton is weakened and corals may be easily detached.
Biology References
Manuel, 1988
,
Anonymous, 1999(f)
,
Zibrowius, 1980
,
Herndl & Velimirov, 1985
,
Lacaze-Duthiers, 1897
Distribution and Habitat
Distribution in Britain & Ireland
Portland Bill, Lyme Bay, off Plymouth Sound, the Isles of Scilly and Lundy only. Believed to no longer occur in North Devon near Ilfracombe where it was present in 1969 (K. Hiscock, pers. comm.)
Global distribution
Found throughout the Mediterranean west of Cyprus and in the Adriatic. Also on the Atlantic coasts of SW England, the Channel Isles, Brittany and Portugal. It has not been recorded despite targeted survey in Madeira, the Azores, or the Canary Isles.
Biogeographic range
Not researched
Depth range
10-40 m
Migratory
Non-migratory / Resident
Distribution Additional Information
This species is at the northern limit of its range possibly forming a relict from a larger previous distribution. It is now restricted to 'ideal' locations.
Substratum preferences
Small boulders, Bedrock, Large to very large boulders
Physiographic preferences
Open coast
Biological zone
Lower Infralittoral, Upper Circalittoral, Lower Circalittoral
Wave exposure
Exposed, Moderately Exposed, Sheltered
Tidal stream strength/Water flow
Moderately Strong (1-3 kn), Weak (<1 kn), Very Weak (negligible)
Salinity
Full (30-40 psu)
Habitat Additional Information
None entered
Distribution References
Manuel, 1988
,
Anonymous, 1999(f)
,
Zibrowius, 1980
,
Lacaze-Duthiers, 1897
Reproduction/Life History
Reproductive type
Gonochoristic
Developmental mechanism
Lecithotrophic
Reproductive Season
July to September
Reproductive Location
Water column
Reproductive frequency
Insufficient information
Regeneration potential
No
Life span
Insufficient information
Age at reproductive maturity
Insufficient information
Generation time
Insufficient information
Fecundity
Insufficient information
Egg/propagule size
Insufficient information
Fertilization type
External
Larvae/Juveniles
Larval/Juvenile dispersal potential
<10m
Larval settlement period
Insufficient information
Duration of larval stage
1 day
Additional Information
Lifespan has not been established for this species but it is probably quite long lived. Individuals tend to die through weakening of the skeleton by boring organisms and subsequent detachment by agents such as foraging fish or careless divers. However, skeletons (dead individuals) have been found still attached to rocks (K. Hiscock, pers. comm.) Populations tend to become extinct through lack of recruitment. Lacaze-Duthiers, (1897) suggests that the sexes are separate. Eggs are laid in succession , at indefinite, fairly well-spaced intervals over a period of time that must be substantial (Lacaze-Duthiers, 1897). Larvae have been successfully produced in aquaria. The eggs are released from the female stomach cavity and those that are unfertilised may float to the surface. Fertilised eggs (young larvae) swim actively in the water column (K. Hiscock pers. comm..) but settle rapidly to the substratum close to the adult, where after a period of freedom they attach themselves in the shape of an ovoid or a ciliated worm (Lacaze-Duthiers, 1897). The larval settling time is generally short but observations from aquaria suggest that the larval stage may exist for up to six weeks before settling. Recruitment is very sporadic. Over 12 years of monitoring on Lundy has shown little or no recruitment and the population there declined by 22 percent between 1993 and 1997. Recruitment may fail for several reasons. Environmental conditions (primarily temperature) are unsuitable for gamete production to occur or to occur synchronously. Alternatively larvae may be swept away into unsuitable habitat by water currents or be consumed by predators before metamorphosing. Recruitment in the Mediterranean is also sporadic. Some recruitment may occur through influx of southern water bodies bringing with it larvae.
Reproduction References
Anonymous, 1999(f)
,
Lacaze-Duthiers, 1897