Home
About BIOTIC
Browse
Get Traits
Traits Resources
Glossary
References
Citations
Publications
Home
Aphelochaeta marioni
Researched By
Will Rayment
Data Supplied By
MarLIN
Refereed by
Dr Peter Gibbs
Taxonomy
Scientific name
Aphelochaeta marioni
Common name
A bristleworm
MCS Code
P824
Recent Synonyms
Tharyx marioni
Phylum
Annelida
Subphylum
Superclass
Class
Polychaeta
Subclass
Order
Spionida
Suborder
Cirratuloidea
Family
Cirratulidae
Genus
Aphelochaeta
Species
marioni
Subspecies
Additional Information
The name change from
Tharyx marioni
to
Aphelochaeta marioni
occurred recently and some authors still use the previous name. Therefore, care should be taken when searching the literature on this species. In this review, where the species was researched under the former name, the species name is given as
Aphelochaeta marioni
(studied as
Tharyx marioni
).
Aphelochaeta marioni
is very difficult to identify (Mike Kendall, pers. comm.) and some authors (e.g. Farke, 1979) have commented that specimens that have been the subject of published research may have been misidentified.
Taxonomy References
Howson & Picton, 1997
,
Hayward & Ryland, 1995b
,
Gibbs
et al.
, 1983
,
Farke, 1979
General Biology
Growth form
Vermiform segmented, Cylindrical
Feeding method
Surface deposit feeder
Mobility/Movement
Burrower
Environmental position
Infaunal
Typical food types
Organic debris, diatoms
Habit
Burrow dwelling
Bioturbator
Flexibility
High (>45 degrees)
Fragility
Fragile
Size
Small-medium(3-10cm)
Height
Growth Rate
1-1.5 mm/month
Adult dispersal potential
100-1000m
Dependency
Independent
Sociability
Solitary
Toxic/Poisonous?
No
Additional Information
Abundance
Gibbs (1969) studied the abundance of
Aphelochaeta marioni
(studied as
Tharyx marioni
) in Stonehouse Pool, Plymouth Sound. In silt/clay sediments at 5 m depth, the species occurred at a maximum density of 108,000 individuals/m
2
. In silt/clay and fine sand at the low water mark, the maximum density was 61,150 individuals/m
2
. Farke (1979) studied the abundance of
Aphelochaeta marioni
(studied as
Tharyx marioni
) in the Wadden Sea, Netherlands. In the intertidal, the maximum recorded abundance was 71,200 individuals/m
2
in muddy sand.
Feeding
Aphelochaeta marioni
is a deposit feeder, feeding at the surface of the sediment at night. While feeding the animal remains in its burrow and the two palps roam at the surface transporting sand, debris and diatoms to the mouth along a tentacle canal crenulated with cilia. Farke (1979) is unsure whether
Aphelochaeta marioni
is a selective feeder, but it seems not, as sand grains have been found in the gut of the animal.
Biology References
Hayward & Ryland, 1995b
,
Gibbs
et al.
, 1983
,
Farke, 1979
,
Gibbs, 1969
Distribution and Habitat
Distribution in Britain & Ireland
Patchily distributed all around the British coast where suitable substrata exist. Occurs on the south west and south coasts of the Isle of Man and has also been recorded in north east Ireland.
Global distribution
Recorded from parts of the North Atlantic, North Sea, western Baltic, Mediterranean, South Pacific and the Indian Ocean.
Biogeographic range
Not researched
Depth range
Mid shore to 5000 m. Mid shore to 5000 m
Migratory
Non-migratory / Resident
Distribution Additional Information
Aphelochaeta marioni
has been recorded from a variety of different sediment types. In the intertidal area of the Wadden Sea, it achieved highest abundance where the sediment fraction smaller than 0.04 mm diameter was greater than 10% of the total sediment (Farke, 1979). In the Severn Estuary,
Aphelochaeta marioni
(studied as
Tharyx marioni
) characterized the faunal assemblage of very poorly oxygenated, poorly sorted mud with relatively high interstitial salinity (Broom
et al.
, 1991). In fact,
Aphelochaeta marioni
displays a remarkable tolerance for salinity range. Wolff (1973) recorded
Aphelochaeta marioni
(studied as
Tharyx marioni
) from brackish inland waters in the Netherlands with a salinity of 16 psu, but not in areas permanently exposed to lower salinities. Farke (1979) reported that the species also penetrated into areas exposed to salinities of 4 psu during short periods at low tide when the freshwater discharge from rivers was high.
Substratum preferences
Fine clean sand, Mud, Muddy sand, Sandy mud
Physiographic preferences
Open coast, Offshore seabed, Strait / sound, Estuary, Enclosed coast / Embayment
Biological zone
Mid Eulittoral, Lower Eulittoral, Sublittoral Fringe, Upper Infralittoral, Lower Infralittoral, Upper Circalittoral, Lower Circalittoral, Circalittoral Offshore, Bathybenthic (Bathyal)
Wave exposure
Sheltered, Very Sheltered, Extremely Sheltered
Tidal stream strength/Water flow
Moderately Strong (1-3 kn), Weak (<1 kn), Very Weak (negligible)
Salinity
Low (<18 psu), Reduced (18-30 psu), Variable (18-40 psu), Full (30-40 psu)
Habitat Additional Information
AMBI Group (Borja
et al.
, 2000)
IV
Distribution References
Farke, 1979
,
Gibbs, 1969
,
Broom
et al
., 1991
,
Wolff, 1973
,
Bruce
et al
., 1963
,
JNCC, 1999
,
Connor
et al.
, 1997(a)
Reproduction/Life History
Reproductive type
Gonochoristic
Developmental mechanism
Lecithotrophic
Reproductive Season
October and November in Plymouth
Reproductive Location
Water column
Reproductive frequency
Annual episodic
Regeneration potential
No
Life span
3-5 years
Age at reproductive maturity
1 year
Generation time
1-2 years
Fecundity
Up to approx 540 eggs
Egg/propagule size
Fertilization type
Larvae/Juveniles
Larval/Juvenile dispersal potential
See additional information
Larval settlement period
Duration of larval stage
Not relevant
Additional Information
The lifecycle of
Aphelochaeta marioni
varies according to environmental conditions. In Stonehouse Pool, Plymouth Sound,
Aphelochaeta marioni
(studied as
Tharyx marioni
) spawned in October and November (Gibbs, 1971) whereas in the Wadden Sea, Netherlands, spawning occurred from May to July (Farke, 1979). Spawning, which occurs at night, was observed in a microsystem in the laboratory by Farke (1979). The female rose up into the water column with the tail end remaining in the burrow. The eggs were shed within a few seconds and sank to form puddles on the sediment. The female then returned to the burrow and resumed feeding within half an hour. Fertilization was not observed, probably because the male does not leave the burrow. The embryos developed lecithotrophically and hatched in about 10 days (Farke, 1979). The newly hatched juveniles were
ca
0.25 mm in length with a flattened, oval body shape, and had no pigment, chaetae, cirri or palps. Immediately after hatching, the juveniles dug into the sediment. Where the sediment depth was not sufficient for digging, the juveniles swam or crawled in search of a suitable substratum (Farke, 1979). In the microsystem, juvenile mortality was high (
ca
10% per month) and most animals survived for less than a year (Farke, 1979). In the Wadden Sea, the majority of the cohort reached maturity and spawned at the end of their first year, although some slower developers did not spawn until the end of their second year (Farke, 1979). However, the population of
Aphelochaeta marioni
in Stonehouse Pool spawned for the first time at the end of the second year of life (Gibbs, 1971). There was no evidence of a major post-spawning mortality and it was suggested that individuals may survive to spawn over several years. Gibbs (1971) found that the number of eggs laid varied from 24-539 (mean=197) and was correlated with the female's number of genital segments, and hence, female size and age.
Dispersal
Under stable conditions, adult and juvenile
Aphelochaeta marioni
disperse by burrowing (Farke, 1979). In the microsystem, a glass barrier in the sediment prevented the movement of animals to new areas over a period of some months, even though dispersal could have occurred by creeping on the surface or swimming. When the barrier was removed, the new areas were soon colonized (Farke, 1979). Farke (1979) reported that
Aphelochaeta marioni
(studied as
Tharyx marioni
) was capable of swimming but only did so under abnormal circumstances, e.g. when removed from the sediment. Farke (1979) suggested that as there was no pelagic stage, dispersal and immigration to new areas must mainly occur during periods of erosion when animals are carried away from their habitat by water currents.
Reproduction References
Farke, 1979
,
Gibbs, 1971
,
Beukema, 1995